A Study of the Book of Titus

Sermon # 5 

Final Warnings About Division

Titus 3:8-15 

       Paul concludes his letter to his protégé Titus with a cluster of seemingly miscellan-eous messages, but they have the commonality that they all are requests or instructions for Titus to do something.  

FIRST, AFFIRM PROFITABLE THINGS

(v. 8) “This is a faithful saying, and these things I want you to affirm constantly, that those who have believed in God should be careful to maintain good works. These things are good and profitable to men.”

       If we back up to verse eight, we see that Paul reminds the believers that as recipients of Grace they should be doers of good. Salvation should lead to service. One of the themes of this letter would have to be found in the expression “good works” which occurs many times in this letter. 

 Pattern for good works (Titus 2:7) “in all things showing yourself to be ??a pattern of good works; in doctrine showing integrity.” 

Zealous for good works (Titus 2:14)

“who gave Himself for us, that He might redeem us from every lawless deed and purify for Himself His own special people, zealous for good works.” 

Ready for Good works (Titus 3:1)

“Remind them to be subject to rulers and authorities, to obey, to be ready for every good work.” 

Maintain good works. (Titus 3:8)

“….those who have believed in God should be careful to maintain good works.” 

Meet the Needs of the Saints through good works (Titus 3:14) “And let our people also learn to maintain good works, to meet urgent needs, that they may not be unfruitful.”

       He Was Not Only To Affirm Profitable Things but… 

SECOND, AVOID UNPROFITABLE CONTROVERSIES (v. 9)

“But avoid foolish disputes, genealogies, contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and useless.”

       Having told Titus to affirm or insist on certain things (v. 8) he now tells him to avoid certain others (v. 9). In fact “avoid” is in the imperative tense which means that it is a command.  

Avoid these Disputes because they Accomplish Nothing.

       Our struggle with this command to “avoid… disputes” comes from knowing that there are indeed some things that are worth fighting for even if as one author put it “it seems divisive to separate from divisive people?” [R. Kent Hughes. p. 364].  Paul is not saying that we should not defend the truth, rather he is warning against getting sucked into “foolish” and pointless arguments. Paul has more to say on this subject in (2 Tim 2:14-17, 23) “Remind them of these things, charging them before the Lord not to strive about words to no profit, to the ruin of the hearers. (15) Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. (16) But shun profane and idle babblings, for they will increase to more ungodliness. (17) And their message will spread like cancer….. (23) But avoid foolish and ignorant disputes, knowing that they generate strife.”

No matter how brilliant or sophisticated or scholarly the arguments may be if the object is to defend a position, rather than to know the truth then any such discussion is foolish and without purpose. These kinds of arguments can go on for hours over insignificant theological points. The fact is that it is easier to argue the fine points of theology than it is to be kind and considerate, to be helpful and loving at home, or to be efficient and diligent at our place of employment.   

Avoid these Disputes because they lead to improper Attitudes.

But if it should be that if we must defend the truth is should be in the right way with the proper attitude. We should remain fair, truthful and loving in our response which those with whom we disagree (1 Peter 3:15). “But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts, and always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you, with meekness and fear.”

       Stuart Briscoe in his book “Purifying the Church: What God Expects of You an Your Church” provides enlightenment of how division occurs through an examination of the correlation of three words, differences, difficulties and divisions.

ˇ        Differences are inevitable.

ˇ        Difficulties are probable. They are caused when:

       positions that are not clear

       perspectives that become clouded

       personalities become involved

       parties are formed

ˇ        Division is possible.

[Stuart Briscoe in his book “Purifying the Church: What God Expects of You an Your Church” (Ventura, Calif, Regal Books, 1987) pp. 200-207] 

Avoid these Disputes because they lead to Division.

The reason that the believer is to avoid disputes is because they lead to division. The idea of division within the church is an idea completely repugnant to the Apostle Paul who wrote in 1 Cor 1:10, “Now I plead with you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.”

It is in this spirit that Bishop Burnet wrote his preface to the classic work The Life of God in the Soul of Man, written by Henry Scougal in the latter part of the seventeenth century. He said, “There is scarce a more unaccountable thing to be imagined, than to see a company of men professing a religion, one great and main precept whereof is mutual love, forbearance, gentleness of spirit, and compassion to all sorts of persons, and agreeing in all the essential parts of its doctrine, and differing only in some less material and more disputable things, yet maintaining those differences with zeal so disproportioned to the value of them, and prosecuting all that disagree from them with all possible violence; or if they want means to use outward force, with all bitterness of spirit. They must needs astonish every impartial beholder, and raise great prejudices against such persons’ religion, as made up of contradictions; professing love, but breaking out in all the acts of hatred.”  [As quoted by Jack Deere. Surprised by the Power of the Spirit., (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1993), pp. 176, 177.]

       Paul says that such division is “foolish” (moros) in the Greek it is the word from which we get moron. We are to move away from moronic arguments.

       He Is Told To Avoid Unprofitable Controversies…. 

THIRD, DISCIPLINE DIVISIVE PERSONS

(vv. 10-11) Reject a divisive man after the first and second admonition, (11) knowing that such a person is warped and sinning, being self-condemned.”

       First, this person is identified as a “divisive” person (harietikon) is the word from which we get heretic. W.E. Vine defines heresy as “that which is chosen, hence an opinion; especially a self-willed opinion which is substituted for submission to …truth and leads to division and the formation of a sect or party.” Since it carries the meaning of choice, the word denotes a person who chooses to follow erroneous opinions even at the expense of the unity of the church.

[W.E. Vine. An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words. (Old Tappan, N.J.: Fleming Revell Co., 1966) p. 557]  It would seem that a heretic is more than just some one who has an erroneous opinion, but he uses the opinions to create a division within the church. It is therefore possible to have a false opinion concerning Scripture or the truth and not be heretic because they are not contentious about them.

       As John MacArthur points out “here we have someone who has chosen some unbiblical, some unacceptable way and he is gathering adherents and he is causing strife and division and factions in the church…. He may be holding some novel interpretation, some novel myth, some genealogical extrapolation or mystical interpretation. He may be holding some ignorant interpretation of Scripture. He may be also holding some action, some personal whim, some personal preference about behavior or conduct or whatever. The issue is that he is divisive.” [John MacArthur. “The Last Word on Relationships. Message on Titus 3:9-15. p. 10  www.biblebb.com/files/MAC/56-26.htm ]

       Secondly, Titus is told how to treat such a divisive person. There seems to be implied here a three stage plan, the beginning with a two clear warnings, (v. 10) “…. after the first and second admonition…”  Paul is completely in tune with Jesus’ own admonitions in Matthew 18:15-17. The two warnings are to be seen as redemptive because the person is warned not once but twice in the hope that they will turn back, “admonish him as a brother.”

       But what happens when there is no response? Then, they are to be to “reject” or have nothing to do with such a person. In other words, the uncooperative or rebellious person is to be treated as an outsider as the Lord advised in Matthew 18:17. The goal of such treatment is not punishment but that such treatment will bring the person to their senses and lead them to repentance and restoration. This may refer to either formal church discipline or social exclusion (Rom 16:17-18). “Now I urge you, brethren, note those who cause divisions and offenses, contrary to the doctrine which you learned, and avoid them. (18) For those who are such do not serve our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly, and by smooth words and flattering speech deceive the hearts of the simple.”

In 2 Thessalonians 3:14 Paul advises, “And if anyone does not obey our word in this epistle, note that person and do not keep company with him, that he may be ashamed.”

Don’t let them be a part so that they can be ashamed and learn they can’t do that.

John MacArthur states, “Boy, it would sure change the complexion of the church today if the church would rise to that level, wouldn’t it? We’ve got people running loose espousing all kinds of bizarre mystical stuff, all kinds of unbiblical stuff and we have a tendency in the church in the name of unity… not only to allow them but to give them a platform and honor them.” [MacArthur. p. 11]

       Unfortunately today people who fail to respond in repentance to the warnings given, compound the problem by denying what they have done and simply transfer to another church.

The subject of Church discipline has fallen on disfavor in our day. “There have certainly been times in church history when discipline has been exercised with something resembling fiendish delight. We have all been made aware by the critics of Christianity of the excesses of some of our forbears in the administration of church discipline. Burnings at the stake, wearing of scarlet letters, inquisitions have all served to make modern church people decidedly nervous about disciplining their members.

In more recent time the threat of legal action in the courts and the possible resultant crippling damages, have made church leaders even more reluctant to deal with erring members. But the fact remains that if proper discipline is not applied where appropriate, the result will be the marked decline in the spiritual nature of the church” and confusion to a lost world. [Briscoe. p. 212]

       The heretic then is one who causes division, by pressing his own destructive opinions on others. These divisive people are characterized as “warped and sinning” and “self-condemned.” Since the erroneous opinion this person uses to cause division and strife in the church was of his own choice they therefore bring condemnation upon themselves. 

Final Messages  (vv. 12-14)

       In verses twelve through fourteen we have three final tasks that are assigned to Titus.

       First, (v. 12) When your replacement arrives to take your place in Crete then you are to come and be with me (Paul). “When I send Artemas to you, or Tychicus, be diligent to come to me at Nicopolis, for I have decided to spend the winter there.” Paul is not sure at this point which of the two men he will send to replace Titus, but one of these men will sent.

       Aretemis is a man that we do not know anything further about. He is mentioned here and he must have been a recognized servant or he would not have even been considered for the job.

       Tychicus, on the other hand is familiar to the New Testament reader (Eph 6:21, Col 4:7). He accompanied Paul on his third missionary journey from Corinth to Asia (Acts 20). He was the man entrusted to deliver the Ephesian and the Colossian letters. And according to 2 Tim 4 he was the man sent to replace Timothy at Ephesus.

       Second, (v. 13) Two other brethren are coming your way, help them on their way. “Send Zenas the lawyer and Apollos on their journey with haste, that they may lack nothing.”

       Zenas is another unknown, we do not even know what kind of lawyer he was (Roman or Jewish). An interesting sidelight is that he is the only Christian lawyer ever mentioned in Scripture.

       Apollos, is well known. He was the eloquent preacher from Alexandra who were are introduced to in Acts 18. At first he knew only about the baptism of John the Baptist, but he was taken in by Aquila and Priscilla who instructed him in the things of Christ. He later worked at the church at Corinth and became a partner with Paul.

       These two men are apparently on their way to some missionary endeavor and Titus is instructed to do everything in his power to see that they receive whatever it is that they need so that they can be speeded on their way.

       Third, (v. 14) Tell everyone to help each other. “And let our people also learn to maintain good works, to meet urgent needs, that they may not be unfruitful.”   Paul says if everyone would learn to engage in good deeds they would be able to meet the pressing needs within the congregation.

       Paul’s final word of farewell is found in (v. 15) “All who are with me greet you. Greet those who love us in the faith. Grace be with you all. Amen.”

Click on the BACK button to return to "A Study of  the book of   Titus" page.

Click to go back to the Study of Titus page.